Sequence of visual cortex stimulation affects phosphene brightness in blind subjects.

BACKGROUND: Visual cortical prostheses (VCP) could potentially benefit a majority of the blind population. Feasibility testing of these VCP opens new avenues to characterize stimulation of visual cortex in blind subjects. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To determine if sequential stimulation of visual cortex produces a perception bias in phosphene brightness. METHODS: We stimulated three blind subjects implanted with the Orion array with sequences of two and three electrodes and asked them to determine the brighter phosphene, using interval forced-choice paradigms. We selected a set of reference electrodes as the constant stimuli across sequences and compared across three different amplitude levels keeping all other stimulation parameters fixed across electrodes. RESULTS: For two subjects, we measured a significant increase in the probability of perceiving a lower-level amplitude just as bright or brighter than a higher-level amplitude when stimulated later in the sequence (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The probability of reference electrodes selected as brighter was also higher during the second phase, across most amplitude comparisons. For the third subject, there were measurable but not significant changes, where the first stimuli were perceived as brighter. The effects were consistent within subjects in the three-electrode sequences, where the probability of the reference electrode selected as brighter was correlated to when it was presented in the sequence. CONCLUSIONS: We showed evidence of temporal interactions in non-overlapping sequences of electrodes, where the direction of the effect was subject specific but consistent across a variety of electrode locations and current amplitude levels.

Multi-electrode stimulation evokes consistent spatial patterns of phosphenes and improves phosphene mapping in blind subjects.

BACKGROUND: Visual cortical prostheses (VCPs) have the potential to restore visual function to patients with acquired blindness. Successful implementation of VCPs requires the ability to reliably map the location of the phosphene produced by stimulation of each implanted electrode. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of different approaches to phosphene mapping and propose simple improvements to mapping strategy. METHODS: We stimulated electrodes implanted in the visual cortex of five blind and fifteen sighted patients. We tested two fixation strategies, unimanual fixation, where subjects placed a single index finger on a tactile fixation point and bimanual fixation, where subjects overlaid their right index finger over their left on the tactile point. In addition, we compared absolute mapping in which a single electrode was stimulated on each trial, and relative mapping with sequences containing stimulation of three to five phosphenes on each trial. Trial-to-trial variability present in relative mapping sequences was quantified. RESULTS: Phosphene mapping was less precise in blind subjects than in sighted subjects (2DRMS, 16 ± 2.9° vs. 1.9 ± 0.93°; t (18) = 18, p = <0.001). Within blind subjects, bimanual fixation resulted in more consistent phosphene localization than unimanual fixation (BS1: 4.0 ± 2.6° vs. 19 ± 4.7°, t (79) = 24, p < 0.001; BS2 4.1 ± 2.0° vs. 12 ± 2.7°, t (65) = 19, p < 0.001). Multi-point relative mapping had similar baseline precision to absolute mapping (BS1: 4.7 ± 2.6° vs. 3.9 ± 2.0°; BS2: 4.1 ± 2.0° vs. 3.2 ± 1.1°) but improved significantly when trial-to-trial translational variability was removed. Although multi-point mapping methods did reveal more of the functional organization expected in early visual cortex, subjects tended to artificially regularize the spacing between phosphenes. We attempt to address this issue by fitting a standard logarithmic map to relative multi-point sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Relative mapping methods, combined with bimanual fixation, resulted in the most precise estimates of phosphene organization. These techniques, combined with use of a standard logarithmic model of visual cortex, may provide a practical way to improve the implementation of a VCP.

Eye movements and the perceived location of phosphenes generated by intracranial primary visual cortex stimulation in the blind.

BACKGROUND: Restoring sight for the blind using electrical stimulation of the visual pathways is feasible but demands an understanding of the spatial mapping of the visual world at the site of targeted stimulation, whether in the retina, thalamus, or cortex. While a visual cortex stimulator can bypass the eye and create visual percepts, there is an inherent dissociation between this stimulation and eye movements. It is unknown whether and how robustly the brain maintains the oculomotor circuitry in patients with bare- or no-light perception. OBJECTIVE: To critically and quantitatively evaluate the effect of eye movements have on phosphene locations elicited by cortical stimulation that bypasses the eyes in order to restore sight in blind subjects. METHODS: The NeuroPace Responsive Neurostimulator (RNS) and the Orion visual cortical prosthesis devices were used to electrically stimulate the visual cortex of blind subjects with bare or no light perception. Eye positions were recorded synchronized with stimulation and the location of the percepts were measured using a handheld marker. RESULTS: The locations of cortical stimulation-evoked percepts are shifted based on the eye position at the time of stimulation. Measured responses can be remapped based on measured eye positions to determine the retinotopic locations associated with the implanted electrodes, with remapped responses having variance limited by pointing error. CONCLUSIONS: Eye movements dominate the perceived location of cortical stimulation-evoked phosphenes, even after years of blindness. By accounting for eye positions, we can mimic retinal mapping as in natural sight.

Electronic retinal prosthesis for severe loss of vision in geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: First-in-human use.

BACKGROUND: To date there are yet no available approved therapies for Geographic Atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Single site, non-randomized safety and efficacy study presenting the preliminary results in a cohort of five late stage AMD (GA) patients successfully implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System (Second Sight Medical Products Inc., Sylmar, CA, USA). Extensive fundus imaging including retinal photographs from which the GA area was measured. A combination of custom and traditional tests designed for very low vision subjects assessed visual function in study subjects. A Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment was carried out to evaluate the impact of the system on the subject's daily life. In addition, a study to evaluate structural characteristics of the visual cortex of the brain was performed in one subject using magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Seven device-related adverse events were reported, four of which were classed as serious adverse events. Retinal detachment was reported in three patients and was successfully treated within 12 months of onset. Testing showed an improvement in visual function in three of five patients with the system turned on. Magnetic resonance imaging assessed in one patient after implantation indicates a selective increase in cortical myelin and thickness in visual brain regions 1 year post implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Epiretinal prostheses can successfully be implanted in those affected by GA secondary to late-stage AMD and can elicit visual percepts by electrical stimulation of residual neuroretinal elements and improve basic visual function in those affected.

Improved performance and safety from Argus II retinal prosthesis post-approval study in France.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the post-approval long-term outcomes of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis, with a specific focus on its functional visual benefit in patients' daily activities. METHODS: Eighteen patients with bare light perception due to end-stage retinitis pigmentosa were included in a French prospective, multicentre, single-arm study and followed for 2 years. Visual benefit in patients' daily activities was monitored through the use of the Functional Low-vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA), and the final score at 2 years was the primary effectiveness outcome. Standardized visual assessments were also performed. Device- or procedure-related adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects completed the study. Positive impacts of the Argus II system on functional vision and well-being were demonstrated for over 70% of subjects on the FLORA. Among the daily activities/tasks tested, finding doorways was one of the most statistically significantly improved tasks (p < 0.001), along with estimating the size of an obstacle (p < 0.001), visually locating a place setting on a dining table (p < 0.001) and visually locating people in a non-crowded setting (p < 0.001). Visual function was improved on most standardized tests. Only two device- or procedure-related serious adverse events were observed (one vitreous haemorrhage and one endophthalmitis, both resolved with treatment). No explantation was required. CONCLUSION: This first report of a completed post-approval study of Argus II with a two-year follow-up demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of the Argus II System in a real-world cohort of patients and further highlights its real functional benefit in implanted patients' daily activities.

Improved localisation and discrimination of heat emitting household objects with the artificial vision therapy system by integration with thermal sensor.

AIM: To demonstrate the potential clinically meaningful benefits of a thermal camera integrated with the Argus II, an artificial vision therapy system, for assisting Argus II users in localising and discriminating heat-emitting objects. METHODS: Seven blind patients implanted with Argus II retinal prosthesis participated in the study. Two tasks were investigated: (1) localising up to three heat-emitting objects by indicating the location of the objects and (2) discriminating a specific heated object out of three presented on a table. Heat-emitting objects placed on a table included a toaster, a flat iron, an electric kettle, a heating pad and a mug of hot water. Subjects completed the two tasks using the unmodified Argus II system with a visible-light camera and the thermal camera-integrated Argus II. RESULTS: Subjects more accurately localised heated objects displayed on a table (p=0.011) and discriminated a specific type of object (p=0.005) presented with the thermal camera integrated with the Argus II versus the unmodified Argus II camera. CONCLUSIONS: The thermal camera integrated with the artificial vision therapy system helps users to locate and differentiate heat-emitting objects more precisely than a visible light sensor. The integration of the thermal camera with the Argus II may have significant benefits in patients' daily life.

Retina-electrode interface properties and vision restoration by two generations of retinal prostheses in one patient-one in each eye.

OBJECTIVE: The Argus I implant is a first-generation epiretinal prosthesis approved for an investigational clinical trial in the U.S. Its successor, the Argus II implant, has a higher electrode density for increased spatial resolution and covers a larger retinal area to accommodate a wider visual angle. Both generations of Argus restored some vision to end-stage RP patients, but it remains unclear how the increased electrode count affected the visual percepts. Here we report a study of the first person on earth with two 'bionic eyes', with an Argus I implanted in one eye and Argus II in the other, to compare the retina-electrode interface and the visual outcome of the two devices. APPROACH: The retina-electrode interface was examined by electrode impedance, perceptual threshold, and ophthalmic images such as ocular coherence tomography data and fundus imaging. The subject's visual outcomes were evaluated by computer-based visual function tests and subjective feedback. MAIN RESULTS: The electrode impedance of both Argus I and II slowly decreased overtime after implantation, accompanied by a gradual increase in the perceptual threshold. A quantitative analysis of the impedance and retina-electrode distance revealed somewhat different causes of impedance change in Argus I vs. II. Evaluation of the visual functions restored and feedback from the subject suggest that the Argus II device enables improved spatial visual ability over Argus I, but adaptation to prosthetic vision did not lead to a measurable performance improvement in the standard visual function tests. SIGNIFICANCE: This study of Argus I and II in the same subject directly compares for the first time the interface properties and prosthetic vision in two eyes that share the same disease mechanism and converged visual pathway in higher visual centers, offering exciting new insights into the influence of the electrode parameters and layout to prosthetic vision. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Data collected within clinical trials registered at NIH (NCT00279500 & NCT01860092).

Histopathologic Assessment of Optic Nerves and Retina From a Patient With Chronically Implanted Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System.

PURPOSE: To characterize histologic changes in the optic nerve and the retina of an end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patient after long-term implantation with the Argus II retinal prosthesis system. METHODS: Serial cross sections from the patient's both eyes were collected postmortem 6 years after implantation. Optic nerve from both eyes were morphometrically analyzed and compared. Retina underneath and outside the array was analyzed and compared with corresponding regions in the fellow eye. RESULTS: Although the optic nerve of the implant eye demonstrated significantly more overall atrophy than the fellow eye (P < 0.01), the temporal quadrant that retinotopically corresponded to the location of the array did not show additional damage. The total neuron count of the macular area was not significantly different between the two eyes, but the tack locations and their adjacent areas showed significantly fewer neurons than other perimacular areas. There was an increased expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) throughout the retina in the implant eye versus the fellow eye, but there was no significant difference in the cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) expression. Except for the revision tack site, no significant increase of inflammatory reaction was detected in the implant eye. CONCLUSION: Long-term implantation and electrical stimulation with an Argus II retinal prosthesis system did not result in significant tissue damage that could be detected by a morphometric analysis. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This study supports the long-term safety of the Argus II device and encourages further development of bioelectronics devices at the retina-machine interface.

Phosphene perceptions and safety of chronic visual cortex stimulation in a blind subject.

Stimulation of primary visual cortices has the potential to restore some degree of vision to blind individuals. Developing safe and reliable visual cortical prostheses requires assessment of the long-term stability, feasibility, and safety of generating stimulation-evoked perceptions.A NeuroPace responsive neurostimulation system was implanted in a blind individual with an 8-year history of bare light perception, and stimulation-evoked phosphenes were evaluated over 19 months (41 test sessions). Electrical stimulation was delivered via two four-contact subdural electrode strips implanted over the right medial occipital cortex. Current and charge thresholds for eliciting visual perception (phosphenes) were measured, as were the shape, size, location, and intensity of the phosphenes. Adverse events were also assessed.Stimulation of all contacts resulted in phosphene perception. Phosphenes appeared completely or partially in the left hemifield. Stimulation of the electrodes below the calcarine sulcus elicited phosphenes in the superior hemifield and vice versa. Changing the stimulation parameters of frequency, pulse width, and burst duration affected current thresholds for eliciting phosphenes, and increasing the amplitude or frequency of stimulation resulted in brighter perceptions. While stimulation thresholds decreased between an average of 5% and 12% after 19 months, spatial mapping of phosphenes remained consistent over time. Although no serious adverse events were observed, the subject experienced mild headaches and dizziness in three instances, symptoms that did not persist for more than a few hours and for which no clinical intervention was required.Using an off-the-shelf neurostimulator, the authors were able to reliably generate phosphenes in different areas of the visual field over 19 months with no serious adverse events, providing preliminary proof of feasibility and safety to proceed with visual epicortical prosthetic clinical trials. Moreover, they systematically explored the relationship between stimulation parameters and phosphene thresholds and discovered the direct relation of perception thresholds based on primary visual cortex (V1) neuronal population excitation thresholds.

One-Year Safety and Performance Assessment of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis: A Postapproval Study.

IMPORTANCE: The Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System is indicated for patients with vision loss due to severe to profound outer retinal degeneration, a group with few treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To collect postapproval safety and visual function data for the Argus II. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, postapproval clinical trial conducted at 9 sites in Germany and Italy. Data were collected from December 2, 2011, to September 30, 2017, and patients were followed-up for 12 months or longer. Patients were 25 years or older with severe to profound outer retinal degeneration, some residual light perception or the ability of the retina to respond to electrical stimulation, and a history of useful form vision and were already planning to undergo Argus II implantation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point of this study was the nature and rate of adverse events. Secondary end points included 3 visual function tests: square localization (SL), direction of motion, and grating visual acuity (GVA). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were followed for 12 months or longer after implant. Mean (SD) age was 56 (12) years, 37 (79%) had retinitis pigmentosa, and 27 (57%) were male. Through the first 12 months postimplantation, 23 patients (49%) experienced 51 nonserious adverse events and 12 (26%) experienced 13 serious adverse events (SAEs), 9 of which were judged to be related to the Argus II, and 4 of which were judged to be related to the procedure. The most common SAE was conjunctival erosion, reported in 4 patients. No significance testing was done for group analysis for the SL or direction-of-motion tests. When averaged across the group, patients' accuracy on the SL test, but not on the direction-of-motion test, appeared better when the Argus II was on than when it was switched off. For GVA, more patients at each point in time achieved the 2.9 GVA cutoff in the implanted eye when the Argus II was on compared with it switched off. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Safety and visual function outcomes in this clinical practice setting cohort of patients with Argus II implants were consistent with previously reported results. Longer follow-up of these patients and data from additional patients are required to better outline the risks and benefits of this approach to addressing blindness secondary to severe-to-profound outer retinal degeneration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01490827.

Retinotopic to Spatiotopic Mapping in Blind Patients Implanted With the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis.

Purpose: To quantify the precision of mapping from retinotopic (retina-centered) to spatiotopic (world-centered) coordinates in blind humans implanted with a retinal prosthesis device. Additionally, to demonstrate that an eye tracker can be calibrated on sightless patients based on the percept from a visual implant. Methods: We directly activated epiretinal electrodes to create retinotopic stimuli and recorded the location of the percept at world-based coordinates. In contrast to normal Argus II use where stimulation is a function of the captured scene's image, in this research we directly controlled the waveform in each electrode and measured the percept's location using a trackable handheld marker. For eye tracking, pupil images were recorded with a timestamp synchronized to the stimulation and marker positions. Results: Remapping of the measured world locations to the position of the electrodes on the retina is feasible by accounting for eye orientation at the onset of stimulation. Transformation of pupil images to the eye's orientation (i.e., eye tracker calibration) can be done by solving for the variables that minimize the spread of the remapped retinal electrode locations. After mapping to retinal coordinates based on eye positions, the measured precision of pointing was 2° to 3°, which is comparable to open-loop pointing in sighted individuals. Conclusions: The brain accurately maps the artificial vision induced by a retinal prosthesis based on instantaneous gaze position. Remapping based on eye position is feasible and will increase visual stability in prosthetic vision.

Improvements in vision-related quality of life in blind patients implanted with the Argus II Epiretinal Prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis is to report the change in quality of life (QoL) after treatment with the Argus II Epiretinal Prosthesis in patients with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: The Vision and Quality of Life Index (VisQoL) was used to assess changes in QoL dimensions and overall utility score in a prospective 30-patient single-arm clinical study. VisQoL is a multi-attribute instrument consisting of six dimensions (injury, life, roles, assistance, activity and friendship) that may be affected by visual impairment. Within each dimension, patients were divided into two groups based on how much their QoL was affected by their blindness at baseline (moderate/severe or minimal). Outcomes were compared within each dimension sub-group between baseline and the combined follow-up periods using the Friedman test. In addition, data from the six dimensions were combined into a single utility score, with baseline data compared to the combined follow-up periods. RESULTS: Overall, 80 per cent of the patients reported difficulty in one or more dimensions pre-implant. Composite VisQoL utility scores at follow-up showed no statistically significant change from baseline; however, in three of the six VisQoL dimensions (injury, life and roles), patients with baseline deficits showed significant and lasting improvement after implantation with Argus II. In two of the three remaining dimensions (assistance and activity), data trended toward an improvement. In the final VisQoL dimension (friendship), none of the patients reported baseline deficits, suggesting that patients had largely adjusted to this attribute. CONCLUSION: Patients whose vision negatively affected them with respect to three VisQoL dimensions (that is, getting injured, coping with the demands of their life and fulfilling their life roles) reported significant improvement in QoL after implantation of the Argus II retinal prosthesis. Furthermore, the benefit did not deteriorate at any point during the 36-month follow-up, suggesting a long-term, durable improvement.

Performance of real-world functional vision tasks by blind subjects improves after implantation with the Argus® II retinal prosthesis system.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to test Argus II subjects on three real-world functional vision tasks. DESIGN: The study was designed to be randomized and prospective. Testing was conducted in a hospital/research laboratory setting at the various participating centres. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty eight Argus II subjects, all profoundly blind, participated in this study. METHODS: Subjects were tested on the three real-world functional vision tasks: Sock Sorting, Sidewalk Tracking and Walking Direction Discrimination task MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For the Sock Sorting task, percentage correct was computed based on how accurately subjects sorted the piles on a cloth-covered table and on a bare table. In the Sidewalk Tracking task, an 'out of bounds' count was recorded, signifying how often the subject veered away from the test course. During the Walking Direction Discrimination task, subjects were tested on the number of times they correctly identified the direction of testers walking across their field of view. RESULTS: The mean percentage correct OFF versus ON for the Sock Sorting task was found to be significantly different for both testing conditions (t-test, P < 0.01). On the Sidewalk Tracking task, subjects performed significantly better with the system ON than they did with the system OFF (t-test, P < 0.05). Eighteen (18) of 27 subjects (67%) performed above chance with the system ON, and 6 (22%) did so with system OFF on the Walking Direction Discrimination task. CONCLUSIONS: Argus II subjects performed better on all three tasks with their systems ON than they did with their systems OFF.

Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: The Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System (Second Sight Medical Products, Inc, Sylmar, CA) was developed to restore some vision to patients blind as a result of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or outer retinal degeneration. A clinical trial was initiated in 2006 to study the long-term safety and efficacy of the Argus II System in patients with bare or no light perception resulting from end-stage RP. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial. Within-patient controls included the nonimplanted fellow eye and patients' native residual vision compared with their vision with the Argus II. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty participants in 10 centers in the United States and Europe. METHODS: The worse-seeing eye of blind patients was implanted with the Argus II. Patients wore glasses mounted with a small camera and a video processor that converted images into stimulation patterns sent to the electrode array on the retina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were safety (the number, seriousness, and relatedness of adverse events) and visual function, as measured by 3 computer-based, objective tests. Secondary measures included functional vision performance on objectively scored real-world tasks. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 30 patients remained implanted with functioning Argus II Systems at 5 years after implantation. Only 1 additional serious adverse event was experienced after the 3-year time point. Patients performed significantly better with the Argus II on than off on all visual function tests and functional vision tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year results of the Argus II trial support the long-term safety profile and benefit of the Argus II System for patients blind as a result of RP. The Argus II is the first and only retinal implant to have market approval in the European Economic Area, the United States, and Canada.

Worldwide Argus II implantation: recommendations to optimize patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A position paper based on the collective experiences of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System investigators to review strategies to optimize outcomes in patients with retinitis pigmentosa undergoing retinal prosthesis implantation. METHODS: Retinal surgeons, device programmers, and rehabilitation specialists from Europe, Canada, Middle East, and the United States were convened to the first international Argus II Investigator Meeting held in Ann Arbor, MI in March 2015. The recommendations from the collective experiences were collected. Factors associated with successful outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Factors leading to successful outcomes begin with appropriate patient selection, expectation counseling, and preoperative retinal assessment. Challenges to surgical implantation include presence of staphyloma and inadequate Tenon's capsule or conjunctiva. Modified surgical technique may reduce risks of complications such as hypotony and conjunctival erosion. Rehabilitation efforts and correlation with validated outcome measures following implantation are critical. CONCLUSIONS: Bringing together Argus II investigators allowed the identification of strategies to optimize patient outcomes. Establishing an on-line collaborative network will foster coordinated research efforts to advance outcome assessment and rehabilitation strategies.

An analysis of observer-rated functional vision in patients implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System at three years.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to compare observer-rated tasks in patients implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System, when the device is ON versus OFF. METHODS: The Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA) instrument was administered to 26 blind patients implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System at a mean follow-up of 36 months. FLORA is a multi-component instrument that consists in part of observer-rated assessment of 35 tasks completed with the device ON versus OFF. The ease with which a patient completes a task is scored using a four-point scale, ranging from easy (score of 1) to impossible (score of 4). The tasks are evaluated individually and organised into four discrete domains, including 'Visual orientation', 'Visual mobility', 'Daily life and 'Interaction with others'. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed each of the 35 tasks. Overall, 24 out of 35 tasks (69 per cent) were statistically significantly easier to achieve with the device ON versus OFF. In each of the four domains, patients' performances were significantly better (p < 0.05) with the device ON versus OFF, ranging from 19 to 38 per cent improvement. CONCLUSION: Patients with an Argus II Retinal Prosthesis implanted for 18 to 44 months (mean 36 months), demonstrated significantly improved completion of vision-related tasks with the device ON versus OFF.

Eye movements as a marker for visual prosthesis spatial mapping - A feasibility study using a blind patient implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis.

Spatial mapping, the location in space of a perceived location due to an implanted electrode's electrical stimulation is important in the design of visual prostheses. Generally, a visual prosthesis system consists of an implanted electrode array, an external camera that acquires the image, and a transmitter that sends the information to the implanted electrodes. In cortical visual implant, the layout of the implanted array in most cases does not match the retinotopic map and it is necessary to find the location of the percept of each electrode in world coordinates. Herein, we show the feasibility of using eye movements as markers to construct the spatial map of the implanted electrodes. A blind patient implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis was instructed to conduct an eye movement to the location of a percept generated by an electrical stimulation at different retinal locations. By analyzing the eye movements triggered by the electrical stimulation, we were able to reconstruct the spatial map of the electrodes. Our experiment demonstrates that a blind person still maintains control of eye movements that can be used to map the percept location of the implanted electrodes.

OPTOMAP WIDEFIELD IMAGING OF THE ARGUS II RETINAL PROSTHESIS IN PATIENTS WITH RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA.

PURPOSE: To explore the utility of using ultra-widefield imaging to visualize the Argus II implant in the eyes of three patients with retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: Case series of three patients with retinitis pigmentosa who were implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System; two of whom were enrolled in the Argus II clinical trial and one received the implant after the commercial release of the device. Optomap widefield fundus autofluorescence and color images of both eyes were taken in all three patients by an experienced technician using the Optos 200Tx imaging system. Analysis focused on fundus autofluorescence images of the implanted eyes and consisted of assessing the location and configuration of the Argus II electrode array and cable, and also the condition of the surrounding retina. Analysis was led by an experienced vitreoretinal surgeon. RESULTS: Optos fundus autofluorescence images of the implanted eyes in all 3 patients gave a wide-angle view of the retina, with the electrode array and cable clearly visible. The status of the array and cable was able to be determined without difficulty. All 3 cases showed an appropriate mild-to-moderate bowing of the cable, and also the electrode array being positioned on or near the macula with a superotemporal tilt. Other features, such as "bone spicules," were also clearly seen. Optos color images were not as useful in the analysis because of an exaggerated green light artifact seen in the implanted versus the nonimplanted eyes. CONCLUSION: Optomap fundus autofluorescence widefield images are useful in determining the configuration of the Argus II cable and the position of the electrode array on the retina and therefore are a useful component of the postoperative surveillance of patients implanted with the device. Using autofluorescence avoids the generation of a light reflection artifact often seen with Optos color imaging.

Ten-Year Follow-up of a Blind Patient Chronically Implanted with Epiretinal Prosthesis Argus I.

PURPOSE: The Argus I implant is the first-generation epiretinal prosthesis approved for an investigational clinical trial by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Herein we report testing results obtained from a 10-year follow-up to study the physiologic effects of the bioelectronic visual implant after prolonged chronic electrical stimulation. DESIGN: Case report. PARTICIPANT: One man, 55 years of age when enrolled in the study, underwent surgical implantation of the Argus I in June 2004, followed by periodic tests from July 2004 through June 2014, spanning a total of 10 years. METHODS: The decade-long follow-up consisted of implant system performance tests, subject visual function evaluation, and implant-retina interface analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in electrode impedance and perceptual threshold over the time course; subject's performance on visual function task, orientation, and mobility tests; and optical coherence tomography data, fundus imaging, and fluorescein angiography results for the assessment of subject's implant-retina physical interface. RESULTS: Electrically elicited phosphenes were present 10 years after implantation of an epiretinal stimulator. The test subject not only was able to perceive phosphenes, but also could perform visual tasks at rates well above chance. CONCLUSIONS: This decade-long follow-up report provides further support for the use of retinal prostheses as a long-lasting treatment for some types of blindness.